LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Chino Hills prepared to fight additional power lines 

The number of power towers behind homes on Paseo Del Palacio Street will be increased by 50 percent.

The street is just one example of a densely populated residential area that will be affected by the proposed power line project.

For every two existing power lines, a new one will be added in between, said Chuck Adamson, Southern California Edison’s senior project manager, about Paseo Del Palacio Street on Tuesday.

“In this area there’s an additional tower, in between (existing towers), to be built,” he said, but that it will vary depending on the terrain.

In about two weeks an aerial map will be available on Edison’s Web site that shows the proposed route and pinpoints the towers that will either be activated, added or enhanced, Adamson said.

The route is part of a $1.8 billion project to deliver electricity generated by wind power in the Tehachapi Pass in Kern County, and Edison must increase its renewable energy production to 20 percent by 2010, to comply with a series of laws and rules.

Edison filed its application for the project with the Public Utilities Commission at the end of June and, upon acceptance, expects construction to begin by 2009.

The city filed a formal protest against Edison last week, and backed hundreds of residents who oppose the route that would activate and expand power lines near at least 1,500 homes.

City Attorney Mark Hensley said the city is requesting that the commission reject Edison’s proposed route and work with the city to find an alternative.

“We are continuing to analyze the routes that are available,” he said, and that the process could continue for years, depending on the court actions that take place.

By Shelli DeRobertis

dailybulletin.com

8 August 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky