LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Appeal to Assembly over turbine plans 

The Assembly is being asked to step in over plans for six new wind turbines in south Carmarthenshire.

Councillors approved an application to build the turbines near an existing wind farm at Pendine last week.

Windfarm campaigner Caroline Evans, a co-ordinator for the protest group Carmarthenshire Against Rural Turbines, said they have demanded the Assembly call in the application.

She said: “I think this will have a massive impact on the landscape.”

She questioned how the planning department could say the development would not have an adverse effect on the landscape.

“They will be bigger than the current turbines, not necessarily taller but with larger blades.”

“I just don’t understand why they build them in such inappropriate places. Why aren’t they putting them along motorways?”

She said the Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire branches of the Campaign for the Protection of Rural Wales have also lodged objections with the Assembly.

Developers Nuon Renewables were given the green light to develop the land at Parc Cynog Farm, Castle Lloyd Farm and Westmead Farm.

Planning officer David Poulter told the committee that there were already five turbines at the site and proposals for another six.

There was increased urgency on the part of the Government to generating energy from renewable sources.

Planning permission for the existing wind farm, now proposed to be extended, was granted on appeal in February 2000.

Officers recommended approval of the extension saying that the proposed development would make a significant contribution to generation of electricity from a renewable source and would not have an unacceptable environmental impact.

By Graem Wilkenson

Evening Post

25 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky