[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Protestors march against public comment amendment  

Protestors hope to increase public awareness about an amendment they say would put an end to public comment. Now, they’re trying to get more people involved.

Protestors march outside the Stephenson County Courthouse with signs that read “Citizens Must be Allowed to Speak” and “Speak Out.” Dakota resident Carol Johnson says, “We’re worried about the changes they’re trying to make to the zoning process in Stephenson County we’re worried that taking the people out of the process will leave them defenseless and without a voice.”

About two weeks ago the Stephenson County Board voted 12-9 to allow wind turbines on agricultural property without a special use permit. About 1,800 people signed a petition against the idea. But in order to overturn the county’s vote, they had to get at least 5% of the county’s landowners to sign it. Now it’s up to the state’s attorney to find out how many landowners live in the county. Board Chairman John Blum says, “And then when he gets that done, he has to take the petition which probably had 1,600-1,800 names on it and see which names he could correlate with the landowners list and make sure they reach the threshold of 5%. If they reach that, it would mean the vote we took would’ve failed.”

Protestors say they’re marching not because they’re against the wind farms, but for the simple fact that the public’s input was left out. Protest organizer Mike King says, “The real issue is do you want a chance to speak before your public elected officials before they make a decision that could possibly effect your life today, 20 30 40 years from now.”

Chairman Blum says the state’s attorney’s office should let the board know if the signatures meet the required 5-percent by the next board meeting in August.

By Ryan Cummings

13 News

25 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.