[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

The Gull cull  

The seagull population of Barrow has a new hazard to contend with – the whirling blades of the Tesco wind turbines.

Some residents of the town may not shed tears over birds they consider pests (See Vox Pop, page eight) but one Barrow resident is demanding action.

Pat Denny, of Cliff Lane, who runs a bird sanctuary, believes more than 40 seagulls have now been killed by the whirling wind turbine blades.

She is nursing a permanently grounded gull which had a wing smashed by one of the turbines in the Tesco car park and is calling for the superstore group bosses to take action to save birds’ lives in future.

And she appears to have been backed by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds which says in a letter that although it is not against wind turbines, it believes Tesco in Barrow should be doing more to save birds.

Miss Denny says many of the casulaties have been sliced in half by the whirring blades.

She took a dead bird into the store herself recently and demanded action.

She said: “They said it was all up to the engineer and they would get back to me, but they haven’t yet.”

Miss Denny, who struggles financially to house and feed a collection of hurt birds, ducks and geese in her garden, wrote to the RSPB for help.

The RSPB replied that under the Wildlife and Countryside Act it is a criminal offence to intentionally kill birds.

Rowena Langston, a senior research biologist for the RSPB, said in a letter that the bird group was not against wind turbines.

The purpose of putting up the turbines had been to generate energy not to kill birds but in Barrow “birds are being killed as an unfortunate outcome of this energy installation”.

She added: “Morally, knowing birds are being killed by these turbines, Tesco ought to be trying to avert further deaths.”

Miss Denny said: “In principle I am not against wind mills as such, but I think the council was a bit daft giving them permission to go there because it is near to a nesting site in the shipyard. At this time of year the birds are looking for food for their young chicks.”

Miss Denny wants Tesco to consider shielding the blades in some way, or relocating the turbines or making them rotate slower.

She said: “I worry that birds are getting sucked into the vortex of the blades which go so fast.”

Tesco put up the two turbines as a green measure earlier this year.

They provide electricity to power the store’s check out tills.

Last month a Tesco spokesman said: “The turbines partly power the store and are a part of our commitment to reducing our carbon footprint as a company.

“Birds have been killed by the turbines and it’s something which happens intermittently and we apologise unreservedly for any distress.”

North-West Evening Mail

20 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.