LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbines causing trouble in rural areas; 'sound of silence' gone forever 

Opposition is growing to giant wind turbines as the novelty of being paid for wind wears off.

In St. Joseph, south of Winnipeg, a concerned citizens group is protesting a proposal by Bowark Energy Ltd. of Calgary to install 63 wind turbines across a 13-kilometre stretch of arable land.

In Elie, just west of Winnipeg, some residents are demanding a study on long-term costs of a wind turbine proposal by Sequoia Energy.

Applications for the next wave of wind turbines in Manitoba closed Tuesday. The province and Manitoba Hydro will approve three of about 30 proposals submitted.

Complaints about wind power systems include noise, loss of property value, and a perception that the turbines are eyesores junking up the uninterrupted prairie horizon people are used to.

The turbines are nearly as high as the Richardson Building, with giant propellers in front. In Germany, which has the world’s largest wind power industry, hundreds of rural groups have begun protesting what they have dubbed Verspargelung der Landschaft – fields of giant asparagus spears.

Todd Braun, who lives west of St. Joseph and runs a business that includes hosting open-air events, worries about the aesthetics of wind turbines, if approved. The turbines may be fine for farmers but “what happens to the people in the middle … all the neighbours put up with the machinery and noise and get nothing.”

Sleep disruption due to noise is one complaint of people living near wind turbines, say opponents.

“You can’t ignore the noise. The noise is constant, a kind of grinding sound (from the spinning propeller) all day and all night long,” said Maurice Bonin, a welder in St. Joseph.

On windy days, the wind turbines can sound like a jet flying over except the sound doesn’t leave. There is also a pulsing sound emitted by the machine.

Bonin said silence is one of the reasons people choose to live in the country. “The sound of silence, this will be gone forever,” he said.

The wind turbines are so high they must have lights on all night long to warn aircrafts. The propellers cause the lights to flicker, said Nathan Schmidt, also part of the anti-windmill movement near St. Joseph.

The 40-year agreements people in the area are being asked to sign also include a “confidentiality agreement.” The signee is required to keep mum “any and all information and knowledge relating to the Project, the Windpower Facilitiies, the Consideration, or Grantee’s operations, whether in written, oral, electronic, or any other form whatsoever.” The confidentiality agreement contains six sections and four subsections of legalese.

Braun and Bonin have refused to sign contracts with Bowark. They would not have received turbines but are asked to sign because they are in the path of the wind flow. The contract would have only paid them several hundred dollars in exchange for subjecting any future construction on their property to the company’s approval.
Farmers in the area could receive $3,500 per year per turbine on their land. The area in question covers 32 sections, or 32 square miles.

Citizens accuse local politicians of caving in to windmill companies to get extra tax revenues. In Elie, the local council wants to allow wind turbines within 200 metres of houses. In St. Joseph, the Rural Municipality of Montcalm has already established setbacks at 200 metres. Other areas are imposing much greater setback distances of a minimum of 1,000 metres.

By Bill Redekop

Winnipeg Free Press

18 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky