[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

County: 1,800 signatures not relevant to landownership  

FREEPORT – With the current record system in place, Stephenson County officials say it is not possible to calculate with certainty the total number of landowners in the county.

Determining this number has become an issue with the County Board’s approval July 11 of several controversial zoning changes that will affect the wind-farm application process.

Prior to the board’s approval of the changes, it was revealed that objectors to the initiative had filed a written protest containing about 1,800 signatures.

County zoning regulations state that a protest containing signatures from 5 percent of county landowners will alter how a vote is taken on zoning changes. If a protest is ruled valid, the changes would have to be approved by a three-fourths majority vote of the County Board, as opposed to a simple majority.

On July 11, the county declined to recognize the protest and the zoning changes were approved in a narrow 12-9 vote.

County officials maintained that the county’s ordinance did not clearly define how many signatures were needed to equal 5 percent. They also said they could not determine the total number of landowners in the county.

Not a ‘nice little algorithm’

Frank Cook, the county’s special assistant state’s attorney, said it likely would not be possible to come up with a finite number of landowners without physically looking through all the land deeds.

Land trusts that are set up through banks make it especially difficult to determine ownership, Cook said. Some trusts include multiple properties and it’s not always possible to determine who the owners are, he said.

“It’s not a process that lends itself to a nice little algorithm,” Cook said.

County State’s Attorney John Vogt said his office is currently trying to determine the number of landowners, a process that will involve reviewing a substantial number of records.

Vogt said he’s not sure of the time frame on this project, but that he feels his office will “come up with a number.”

Ron Kane, the chief county assessment officer, said the county has 27,208 parcels of land in its tax system. Determining ownership of each of these parcels, however, is not an easy task.

In some cases, older properties only list the husband as an owner and not the wife, which can make it difficult to determine the number of owners, Kane said. Also, deaths are not tracked in the county’s system so an owner who is deceased may still be in the system, he said.

There can also be problems determining ownership when a resident has deeded his property to his children, Kane said.

At this time, it is not possible to calculate an exact number of property owners, Kane said.

“In the end, all anyone will be able to do is give a range,” Kane said.

Officials say changing the local ordinance regarding the signatures is likely not a viable option since it is modeled after a state statute. Ultimately, the state statute would have to be changed in order to make a difference locally, officials said.

Some opponents of the wind farm changes remain skeptical about the county’s motives. Mike King of rural Dakota, who owns property near the proposed Lancaster Wind Farm, said the county’s reasons for not recognizing the protest petition were part of a “scheme” to force a simple majority vote.

The county’s ultimate goal seems to be to make it as easy as possible for wind farms to come into the area, King said.

“With the new ordinance, it’s a cakewalk,” King said.

By Travis Morse

The Journal-Standard

18 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.