[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Federal power surge  

Two years ago, Congress gave the Department of Energy more authority to locate power lines – sometimes against state opposition. An amendment to the energy bill passed recently by the Senate would greatly expand this federal power, especially in the case of wind, solar and geothermal power. While increasing alternative energy sources is important, giving additional power to federal regulators is premature, so it is encouraging that, with a push from Maine lawmakers, the amendment is likely to be rewritten.

In the Energy Policy Act of 2005, lawmakers gave the Energy Department the authority to designate National Interest Electricity Transmission Corridors. Before designating such corridors, where the department determined that new transmission lines needed to be built to ease the flow of electricity, the department was to consult with affected states. Without this consultation, the department designated several “high priority” corridors this spring. None were in New England.

Within “high priority” corridors, local regulators are given one year to approve proposed projects without substantial modifications. If they do not, the applicant can apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and ask the federal regulators to override the local rejection or inaction.

Since the corridors have only been designated for months and no project has yet to be reviewed by state regulators, it is too soon to determine whether this new federal authority needs to be expanded.

However, an amendment, sponsored by South Dakota Sen. John Thune, was included in the Senate energy bill. It would allow individual companies to nominate corridors – they are now designated solely by the Energy Department – and would expand the reasons that such corridors can be created to include boosting economic development and easing access to wind power.

Under the Thune amendment, which was passed by a voice vote without a hearing, a Massachusetts utility can suggest that a new transmission line be built through Maine, says Kurt Adams, chairman of the state’s Public Utilities Commission. Worse, Maine has several proposals to build wind electricity generation facilities here. If they are built, this can open the door to a high priority corridor designation and the usurpation of the PUC’s authority to regulate where transmission lines are built, according to Mr. Adams.

“Maine is prepared to host thousands of megawatts of generation capacity from wind and biomass” to serve southern New England’s “insatiable appetite for energy,” Gov. John Baldacci wrote in a letter to the state’s congressional delegation.

“However, the development of these resources for New England must not harm Maine consumers or adversely impact our environment, which is the cornerstone of our economy,” he wrote.

Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins are working with Sen. Thune to ensure the intent of the amendment – to ensure wind power projects have access to transmission lines – is met without overruling the interests of host states and maybe even assuring that such states’ ratepayers benefit as well.

This would greatly improve the amendment.

By BDN Staff

Bangor Daily News

12 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.