[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Councillors defer plans for £40,000 windfarm officer 

Councillors have rejected plans to recruit a £40,000 windfarm officer.

Members decided not to agree the new one-year post until they have further information on what the job would entail.

Convener Patsy Gilroy told members at a meeting of the planning housing and environment committee on Tuesday: “Itseems that whenever we have spare money sloshing around we spend it on more staff.”

An underspend of £767,000 was identified in the planning budget with officers recommending that £40,000 be allocated to the post of windfarm officer.

The officer would be required to work with local community councils, windfarm developers and other stake-holders to “implement, monitor and evaluate the Dumfries and Galloway regional community benefit windfarm protocol”.

This role is currently being carried out by community groups.

Councillor Gilroy added she was involved with negotiations for Robin Rigg and that the local community council handled this well.

She said: “Why would we pay £40,000 for an officer when the system in place at the moment seems to be going well?

“I think that if this is being done already, I have to wonder if we need this.

“I would suggest we don’t.”

She also added that the community councils are “very capable” and have members who are “quite keen.”

Planning official Alistair Speedie confirmed that there was only funding in place for one year, after suggestions that the post would be kept on for more than the agreed period.

Mid and Upper Nithsdale councillor Andrew Wood suggested that the £40,000 could be better used rather than going towards “another official”.

Councillor Wood asked for more information on the officers job role and added: “£40,000 is a lot of money to be throwing away without knowing what we are throwing the money at.”

Convener Patsy Gilroy also asked for information on how many windfarm developments the officer would be dealing with to warrant his/her salary.

Members agreed unanimously to defer the appointment for more detailed information on the work that would be carried out by the windfarm officer.

By Linzi Watson

The Galloway News

12 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon