[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Guayanilla Windfarm 

As power generation schemes go, I have mixed feelings about wind farms. Obviously they have huge advantages over fossil fuel-powered plants. They also don’t involve damming rivers. But they are not without impacts – they tend to be death traps for birds, and they are visually unappealing.

There will always be trade-offs, and given how serious an issue climate change is I am probably willing to tolerate compromises that I would otherwise consider totally unacceptable (nuclear power being one such). But the spirit of compromise is to find the best way to balance various competing ideas. It’s quite different when you are faced with one of the worst possible scenarios. Plans to construct a wind farm in Guayanilla, Puerto Rico seems to be one of the latter. Not only is it located in prime habitat for a federally listed endangered species (Caprimulgus noctitherus, the Puerto Rican nightjar), it also intrudes into high quality dry forest immediately adjacent to Guánica Forest, the most important remaining tract of dry forest in Puerto Rico.

Having looked at the Environmental Impact Statement I am also shocked at the quality of it. Not only do the authors appear to know nothing about dry forest ecology, there’s also a cheerleading quality about it. I’ve done environmental impact work, and yes, you feel some pressure to look out for the interests of the people who are paying you. But it isn’t in anyone’s interest to produce a bad product. The “reforestation plan” (starts on p. 25) also seems awfully unrealistic.


* BirdLife International: Windfarm permit “seriously contradicts” Endangered Species Act.
* Online petition asking Puerto Rican Governor Aníbal Acevedo Vilá to protect the site.


* Species-area curves – when they get the get the most basic biology so badly wrong, you tend to lose confidence in what they have to say rather rapidly.


10 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon