[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Developer files application for revised wind power project  

A scaled-down version of a proposed wind farm in western Maine has been filed with the Land Use Regulation Commission and public hearings are scheduled for September, project developers said Tuesday.

The latest plan by Maine Mountain Power LLC comes five months after LURC rejected its earlier proposal to erect a total of 30 wind turbines on Black Nubble Mountain and Redington Pond Range near the Sugarloaf USA ski resort.

In the revision, developers removed all 12 turbines from Redington Pond Range while leaving the 18 turbines on Black Nubble. The project would generate 54 megawatts of electricity, enough to power 20,000 homes a year.

Public hearings are tentatively scheduled to be held Sept. 19-21, said Jeffrey Thaler, a Portland attorney for Maine Mountain Power.

LURC could vote on the proposal by the end of the year, Thaler said. If the project is approved then, construction could begin next spring and the project could be operational in 2009, he said.

At a press conference Tuesday, representatives of about 20 conservation, health and other organizations expressed their support for the project. They said it protects Redington Pond Range from development while providing clean energy and reducing U.S. dependence on fossil fuels.

“The revised Nubble Mountain project strikes the right balance,” said Pete Didisheim of the Natural Resources Council of Maine.

Not all conservation groups favor the project, however.

Jody Jones of Maine Audubon said her organization agrees that wind power should be pursued, but that Black Nubble Mountain is an inappropriate site because of its rare plant and animal species and scenic vistas.

She said other opponents include the Maine Appalachian Trail Club, the Appalachian Mountain Club and the National Park Service.

“If we build it, we will be very sorry,” Jones said. “It’s a mistake.”

By The Associated Press wire report


10 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch