[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Fate of controversial wind-farm project to rest on secret ballot  

A secret ballot will decide whether a wind farm will be built on a picturesque Highland estate which was bought by the community.

The project has already caused a divide among residents, with some arguing community-owned turbines would generate valuable income to help regenerate the area, but others saying it would harm the unspoilt scenery.

A public meeting will be held tonight in Lochinver in Sutherland to outline the project and the ballot of 2,000 residents will be held within three weeks to determine the level of support.

The Assynt Foundation took over the 44,000 acres making up the Glencanisp and Drumrunie estates in Sutherland and Wester Ross from the wealthy Vestey family in 2005 for £2.9 million.

The area includes the mountains, Suilven, Canisp, Cul Mor and Cul Beag.

The Scottish Land Fund contributed £1.6 million to the purchase and Highlands and Islands Enterprise’s (HIE) community land unit awarded £605,000.

The community raised £15,000 itself, while the John Muir Trust gave £50,000 and £15,000 per year for five years towards management costs.

The wind farm would involve between one and six community-owned turbines. It has been estimated that three 1.65 megawatt towers would cost £4.5 million and generate £300,000 in income a year.

At an open day earlier this year, the foundation gathered comments which showed that 24 people supported moving to the next step of investigating the project, while 14 were against the development.

Cameron McNeish, the mountaineer and broadcaster, has also spoken out against any wind farm being built in the area. He said it could set a precedent and result in the finest parts of Britain being spoiled, and could harm tourism in the area.

The John Muir Trust’s representative has left the foundation board for a year by mutual agreement to allow the trust to comment openly on the project.

Helen McDade, the JMT policy officer, said she appreciated the foundation has to raise income in order to be viable, but added: “If any application contravenes our policy, we will object.”

Mark Lazzeri, the foundation’s development manager, said:

“If the majority do not wish to see any wind turbines I cannot imagine the foundation wanting to go ahead.”

By John Ross


3 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.