LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm could be torpedoed 

The Environment Court has shaken the foundations of the Motorimu Wind Farm project by slashing the number of turbines by 40 percent, threatening to make the project unviable.

Allco Wind Energy technical director Bernhard Voll said it would either appeal the decision, or withdraw its proposal. Allco owns the wind farm company.

Motorimu Wind Farm had applied for consent to build wind turbines in the Tararua foothills on the border of Horowhenua and Palmerston North.

After a series of delays, the long- awaited decision was released yesterday, cutting the number of proposed turbines from 127 to 75.

Mr Voll said the company was pleased the decision had been released, but was disappointed with the result. “At the moment this decision, as it stands, is hardly acceptable.”

The 52 turbines that were declined were positioned on the front ridge line of the central Tararua Ranges, known as the Te Mata ridge line, and Kaihinu Peak.

Mr Voll said that the declined turbines were the ones that would have produced the most energy. “We might lose 40 percent of the turbines, (but) we lose more than 50 percent of the generation.”

The company would go through the decision “line by line” to decide its next step. “As the project stands at the moment, with this decision, there won’t be a project.”

A city council media release about the decision explained the commissioners’ reasoning.

“The commissioners concluded that for this wind farm proposal, the benefits derived in terms of renewable energy and climate change were not of sufficient national importance, national value and benefit to justify the significant adverse effects associated with landscape, amenity and cultural issues . . .”

It also said that reducing the number of turbines would “assist in mitigating adverse effects in terms of amenity, visual and cumulative effects, along with potential noise effects”.

Mr Voll said it was contradictory to expect sustainable energy without any cost.

“If New Zealand wants wind energy New Zealand has to accept that wind energy is visible. We all need renewable energy, but (people saying) ‘please put it in places where we don’t see or hear it’ just doesn’t work. You have it put it where the resource is.”

By Katie Chapman

Manawatu Standard

28 June 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky