LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

EnergyKontor seek early decision on windfarm plan 

The company behind a proposed windfarm near Ceres has urged Fife Council to decide on the plan within four months.

EnergieKontor has submitted a planning application for a development at Gathercauld including five windturbine generators, a substation and access tracks.

The application to Fife Council – which came 15 months after EnergieKontor first announced the project – noted the determination period for such a plan was 16 weeks.

“Given the considerable amount of ‘front-loading’ that has gone into the preparation of the enclosed submission, we would expect your authority to be able to make a decision within this timescale,” it said.

EnergieKontor project manager Mick McLoughlin told the Fife Herald his company had sent “a clear signal to the authority that they have targets to meet”.

EnergieKontor appealed to the Scottish Executive after the council failed to decide on its earlier application for a windfarm near Auchtermuchty.

Mr McLoughlin said EnergieKontor’s application was in “tip-top condition” and the onus was now on Fife Council to perform.

No changes to the Gathercauld plan had been made as a result of a public exhibition in Craigrothie last month.

“We’ve covered all the angles, covered all the bases,” he said.
Ceres and District Environment and Amenity Protection Group, which opposes a windfarm at Gathercauld, met last week to discuss the application.

Chairman Graham Lang said even though the project had been reduced from 13 turbines to five, the visual impact was still extremely significant.

“That will not be the end of it and EnergieKontor will not be satisfied until they get the dozen or so originally proposed,” said Mr Lang.

“The benefits to the community other than the rent paid to the farmers and some unspecified local employment is minimal.

“Any perceived benefits do not outweigh the damage to communities over a wide area and local commerce will obviously suffer if visitors steer clear of Ceres and Pitscottie.”

By Janet Howie

Fife Today

21 June 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon