[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

EnergyKontor seek early decision on windfarm plan  

The company behind a proposed windfarm near Ceres has urged Fife Council to decide on the plan within four months.

EnergieKontor has submitted a planning application for a development at Gathercauld including five windturbine generators, a substation and access tracks.

The application to Fife Council – which came 15 months after EnergieKontor first announced the project – noted the determination period for such a plan was 16 weeks.

“Given the considerable amount of ‘front-loading’ that has gone into the preparation of the enclosed submission, we would expect your authority to be able to make a decision within this timescale,” it said.

EnergieKontor project manager Mick McLoughlin told the Fife Herald his company had sent “a clear signal to the authority that they have targets to meet”.

EnergieKontor appealed to the Scottish Executive after the council failed to decide on its earlier application for a windfarm near Auchtermuchty.

Mr McLoughlin said EnergieKontor’s application was in “tip-top condition” and the onus was now on Fife Council to perform.

No changes to the Gathercauld plan had been made as a result of a public exhibition in Craigrothie last month.

“We’ve covered all the angles, covered all the bases,” he said.
Ceres and District Environment and Amenity Protection Group, which opposes a windfarm at Gathercauld, met last week to discuss the application.

Chairman Graham Lang said even though the project had been reduced from 13 turbines to five, the visual impact was still extremely significant.

“That will not be the end of it and EnergieKontor will not be satisfied until they get the dozen or so originally proposed,” said Mr Lang.

“The benefits to the community other than the rent paid to the farmers and some unspecified local employment is minimal.

“Any perceived benefits do not outweigh the damage to communities over a wide area and local commerce will obviously suffer if visitors steer clear of Ceres and Pitscottie.”

By Janet Howie

Fife Today

21 June 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch