[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Turbine critics have their say  

Opponents of the proposed Shaffer Mountain Wind Farm along the border of Somerset and Bedford counties have one idea in common:

Not in my backyard.

Officials from Gamesa Energy USA pitched their plan for 30 turbines at a town hall meeting at Pitt-Johnstown’s Living Learning Center on Wednesday.

More than 200 challengers cheered each other’s comments when officials and environmental experts heard from the audience.

Ellen Lutz, Gamesa’s director of development for the Atlantic Region, and Tim Vought, the project’s developer, said the company’s intention is to provide “positive impact on the economy and minimal impact on the environment.”

Most discounted Gamesa’s intentions.

Larry Hutchinson, president of the Shade Creek Watershed Association, said that while he favors wind energy, he doesn’t support turbines on Shaffer Mountain.

“There are miles and miles of abandoned mine lands that could be used,” Shaffer said. “It’s about the whole ecology (of Shaffer). I don’t believe we should trade ecology for energy.”

Hutchinson was one of a dozen folks who said they were concerned about water quality, erosion, deforestation and decreased property values.

Lutz said that, while she and other officials understand the emotion involved, many opinions are based on misinformation.

Dennis McNair said the answers to the nation’s energy problems are to burn clean coal and conserve electricity. “This is the worst place in the world for this project,” he said.

Gamesa hasn’t received permits for the project. Vought said the company still is receiving information from environmental specialists and refining the areas for turbine locations.

By Julie Benamati

The Tribune-Democrat

20 June 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.