[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind-farm forum to address concerns  

Gamesa Energy USA representatives maintain a proposed wind farm on Shaffer Mountain will not damage pristine streams or the migratory paths of eagles.

Those two concerns, raised in a letter from the Central City Sportsmen’s Club opposing installation of 30 giant turbines on the ridge between Somerset and Bedford counties, will be among the issues addressed Tuesday.

Hosted by the Shade Creek Watershed Association, Dark Shade Brownfields Project and AmeriCorps, the forum will give residents a chance to hear details on the proposed Shaffer Mountain project.

Though farm opponents are lining up, the meeting sponsors say they are keeping an open mind.

“Right now, it doesn’t look like something we would back. But we don’t know enough about it,” said Lori Waylonis, brownfields outreach coordinator and AmeriCorps representative. “We’re not completely knowledgeable. We’re there to learn, just like the public.”

The sportsmen’s club has sent a letter to Gamesa opposing the project.

The May 22 letter said the turbines could damage Piney Run and Clear Shade Creek, two of only 28 “exceptional value” trout streams in the state.

The turbines also could affect the area where protected bald eagles migrate twice a year and where the rarer Eastern golden eagles fly, the organization said.

Gamesa ““ a Spain-based company with offices in Philadelphia ““ is proposing to build the electricity generating turbines mostly in Shade Township.

Many are concerned about the impact construction will have on Piney Run, a small tributary of Clear Shade Creek.

“I’m worried,” said Larry Hutchinson, president of the Shade Creek Watershed Association. “We’re concerned about erosion and runoff into Piney Run.”

Waylonis and Hutchinson stressed they favor green energy.

Yet they said it’s up to Gamesa to prove it can build turbines while protecting the ecosystem of fish, flora and animal life.

“We don’t want to make it sound like we’re against windmills. We just need to see some evidence,” Waylonis said.

Gamesa said it has prepared an erosion sediment plan and a post-construction stormwater management plan for the state Department of Environmental Protection.

It is seeking a special permit under the national Pollution District Discharge Elimination System.

“We have a permit application submitted to the DEP and we’ll show we will have zero impact on any stream within the project area,” project developer Tim Vought said.

“We have addressed erosion concerns and stormwater concerns for the long term.”

By Patrick Buchnowski

The Tribune-Democrat

10 June 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.