[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbines approved for town of Wilton  

The Monroe County Planning & Zoning Committee voted 4-1 to grant Summit Ridge Energy LLC a conditional use permit (CUP) to build wind turbines in the town of Wilton Tuesday.

“It was a “˜cookie cutter’ procedure”, said Atty. Glenn M. Stoddard, representing two Wells clients who filed lawsuit against the Committee. “I think they (the Committee) knew their decision before the meeting started.”

Richard Yarrington was again the only Committee member to vote against allowing the construction of wind turbines. He tried to increase setbacks (limits) for the wind turbines to 1,250 ft. from residences not participating in the wind energy project, but the motion failed. Committee members did not discuss the geography of the Wilton area nor any specific issues with the town of Wilton. The Committee seemed to only be extending its conditional use permit to include the town.

All interested parties had legal representation at Tuesday’s meeting, which kept communication terse and the atmosphere sober. Lawyers Raymond M. Roder, representing Summit Ridge Energy, and Glenn M. Stoddard, respresenting Wells clients William Semann, of Norwalk, WI, and Myron Brueggeman, of Chicago, IL, appeared at the meeting. Corporation Counsel for Monroe County Kerry Sullivan-Flock was also present to set up an appointment for the Planning & Zoning Committee to meet with attorney Michael J. Modl, who was appointed by the county insurance company to represent the Committee.

Atty. Stoddard filed a lawsuit against the Monroe County Planning & Zoning Committee May 29 for allowing wind turbines to be built that would affect the health and safety of his clients as well as a private airstrip owned by Brueggeman.

“I don’t think the law is on his side (Atty. Stoddard’s),” said Mark Jacobson, director of business development for Invenergy. “Anytime people try to challenge wind projects, wind prevails.”

Stoddard contends, however, that “it’s never as simple as characterizing it as wind vs. no wind,” and that the governmental procedure was incorrect as well as incomplete.

The town of Wilton has 21 days to veto the conditional use permit or it will automatically become valid. Bill Blackmore, site developer for Invenergy, said the company does not plan to apply for conditional use permits in additional towns.

By Keith Zukas

The Tomah Journal

7 June 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.