[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farms pushed for state parks 

The Rendell administration might push to open Pennsylvania’s state forests and parks to wind farm development, a Cabinet official said yesterday.

Michael DiBerardinis, the secretary of conservation and natural resources, said the administration was “close to a decision” on allowing wind turbines to be erected on public lands controlled by the governor. Legislative approval would be necessary, he told people attending the Penn Future Clean Energy Conference in East Pennsboro Twp.

“We’re facing a global crisis on climate change,” said DiBerardinis, whose department administers the state parks and forests. “We can’t have our cake and eat it, too. Siting wind turbines on public lands is an imperative, not an option.”

His announcement was cued by Penn Future conference director John Hanger and appeared to be a trial balloon. DiBerardinis conceded that not everyone will think wind turbines in parks and forests are a good idea. He said he expects “robust debate” on the proposal.

Rep. Camille “Bud” George, D-Clearfield, chairman of the House Environmental Resources and Energy Committee, was skeptical about the idea and said his committee will need to carefully study the proposal.

“Those lands belong to the people of Pennsylvania, pure and simple,” George said. “Pennsylvanians revere their wild places, and they should always remain a part of our psyche. I don’t think the grandeur of the Grand Canyon of Pennsylvania should be sullied by wind turbines.”

He said DeBerardinis was correct that such measures at least need to be discussed, given the huge energy price increases the state is facing. “I think he would also agree that burning the last stick of furniture to heat the house is not a realistic solution,” George said.

The Pennsylvania Game Commission does not prohibit the building of wind turbines. But it sets conditions for approval and has said none of the wind developers who initially expressed interest followed through.

The Game Commission is not under the direct control of the governor, but the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources is.

DiBerardinis said wind turbine development would need to be reconciled with the department’s mission of stewardship of public lands.

“Pennsylvania forests are most at risk from global climate change,” he said. “We have to get real about a lot of these things. There is no perfect energy source.”

Later in the conference, Ellen Lutz, director of development for Spanish wind developer Gamesa, said there is growing opposition to wind farms in Pennsylvania. More effort is needed to educate the public about “the facts and myths” of wind power, she said.

Sam Enfield, director of development for PPM Atlantic Renewable, said people often ask why wind turbines need to be placed on the state’s mountain ridges. He said it was more economical to build the tall turbines on ridges than in valleys.

“That’s where the development needs to be,” Enfield said.

There was also comment on the belief of some wind energy critics that the turbines are visual pollution.

Brent Alderfer, executive vice president of Iberdrola Renewable Energies, another Spanish company, said, “At least half of us think these things are absolutely beautiful, kinetic sculpture at its finest.”

Lutz said she did not believe wind turbines are visual pollution. Pollution is mercury emissions, sulfur dioxide and global warming, she said.

By David DeKok

The Patriot-News

1 June 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky