[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Critics say renewable energy bill on the too-fast track  

A bill that originally would have allowed Public Service of New Hampshire to build a wood-burning plant in the North Country has morphed into fast-track legislation for all small renewable energy projects.

Now a House committee is grappling on how fast that process should move and whether environmental safeguards will remain in place.

Senate Bill 140 would give the Site Evaluation Committee ““ the multi-agency task force that sites energy plants – 120 days to make a decision on renewable energy plants, such as those that are powered by geothermal sources, wind, solar, and biomass.

But the House Science Energy and Technology committee is considering an amendment that would slow down the process.
According to Catherine Corkery, a spokesperson for the Sierra Club, “120 days doesn’t pass even pass the smell test.”

The amendment would slow down the process to 240 days, two or three months shorter than the current process. It also would require two public hearings and make sure that other processes, such as obtaining an air permit from the Department of Environmental Services, aren’t bypassed. The House panel is scheduled to vote on that amendment ““ which is still being finalized ““ May 29.

While the proposed amendment slowing down the approval process is an improvement, Corkery said, the Sierra Club is still not satisfied. She said it would like the bill to notify abutting property owners directly, and to make sure that transmission line easements are included in the process.

But Douglas Patch, a lobbyist for the renewable energy industry, thinks the amendment represents a “middle ground.”

“It should shorten the process somewhat,” Patch said. “The state should be promoting renewable energy industry, because it’s more sustainable and relies less on foreign oil.”

Current law for non-renewable energy plants doesn’t require abutters to be notified, said Patch, so this “would result in more of a burden on renewable projects rather than less.”

Corkery said she would like that notification to abutters be extended to all plants, renewable or not, so “people would know what’s going on before someone is at your door making an offers on your land.”

By Bob Sanders

New Hampshire Business Review

24 May 2007

nh.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: