[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind's unpredictability affects energy reality  

The European Wind Energy Conference has adopted the European Commission’s estimate that 12 percent of electric energy could be from wind by 2020.

That wind figure is limited to 12 percent by the fact that wind is an intermittent power source. The variability problem is especially acute in summer during those sultry days when there isn’t a breath of air, and electricity demand is highest. High winds create excess power, which often can’t be stored or used. Variability causes the actual capacity of wind turbines to be less than the so-called nameplate capacity.

Germany, Denmark and Spain have Europe’s most aggressive wind-energy programs. Denmark’s thousands of turbines have a nameplate capacity equal to 20 percent of its total electric power, but the actual wind contribution is about 6 percent. Germany’s 16,000 turbines provided 5.7 percent of its electric power in 2006.

For the United States as a whole, wind systems provide less than 1 percent of our electric power. They operate at 29 percent to 30 percent of nameplate capacity, according to the Renewable Energy Laboratory at the University of Massachusetts.

Undeterred by all this technical stuff, our Legislature passed Renewable Energy Standard Bill SF0004, which requires Xcel Energy to use an optimistic 30 percent renewable (at least 25 percent wind) energy by 2020. With the stroke of his gubernatorial pen, Gov. Tim Pawlenty signed legislative law SF0004, thus inking out those pesky physical laws. (He and the Legislature did rely on an elaborate, though also optimistic, technical study that suggested a 20 percent target for wind energy.)

Wind can be a significant part of our future energy needs, but it’s important to be realistic. In Minnesota, the best windy sites are on our western border. Unfortunately, the state’s population and power plants are in the east, requiring a sizeable, as yet unplanned, transmission grid.

Passing paper laws is easy; the laws of nature are a little tougher to amend.

Rolf Westgard
Deerwood

sctimes.com

19 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: