[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wary of claims made by turbine promoters 

I am compelled to challenge statements made by David Taylor of Novera Energy (Review, April 19).

As an HSE consultant and householder in the area, I am very concerned at Novera Energy’s lack of transparency.

That a 360o noise survey has been conducted is misleading. Readings were taken over a short period from only four points, two of which were upwind of the prevailing wind; one which was sheltered on the downwind edge of Rossie Wood and suffered exceptional background noise due to heavy excavations and one which was more than a kilometer distant and which belongs to a land owner named on the planning application.

Besides the apparent inadequacy of the survey, it appears no seismic testing has been done. This testing is necessary to ascertain the noise levels transmitted through bedrock which at Rossie is only a few inches below the surface.

Noise can be amplified by geological strata and carry long distance. There are many instances worldwide of moat construction around wind-farm sites, filled with water, designed to attenuate/change generated frequencies.

Novera Energy will not comment on their intentions to monitor noise post-installation of the turbines.

Legislation which governs noise from wind farms is far less rigorous than that which regulates say, “workshop noise”, is outdated, being based upon older smaller turbines and is toothless – being both imprecise and unenforceable.

Thus we have situations such as Mrs Davis’s ( Review, April 19) where noise peaks of 60Db+ are tolerated under this government preferred recommendation.

I wish to review the noise survey in detail but, despite several requests to Novera Energy to supply me with data obtained by their “independent” assessors, they have ignored my pleas entirely, not even having the courtesy to acknowledge receipt of any of my correspondence.

Novera Energy continue to make magnanimous statements as to the care and attention they are giving the local populace and environment and I am concerned that the public are being fooled by how “green” and “serene” turbines are.

By all means, we should spend money to save the environment, but not on inefficient wind energy that simply lines developers’ pockets whilst destroying the local environment.

Yours etc
Roy A Napier
The Cairt Shed
Mountboy Steadings


3 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky