[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm met with continued opposition 

About 50 town of Mishicot residents voiced opposition Wednesday night to a proposed wind turbine project being considered on four town properties.

Many citizens said they aren’t opposed to the project or the technology that would provide clean energy, but said safety concerns are paramount.

“It’s a great technology, but it has to be put in safely,” said Jeff Roberts, an opponent of the project. Roberts lives just east of two proposed turbines.

The Mishicot town board on Wednesday held a meeting to discuss the seven turbines proposed by Emerging Energies LLP of Hubertus. Emerging Energies is required to present information at a town meeting before applying for a county conditional use permit for the project.

The town board must also approve the project before the county approves a conditional use permit. No action was taken Wednesday, but the board could vote on the wind farm as early as its June 4 meeting, Town Chairman Chuck Hoffman said.

Emerging Energies was granted a conditional use permit in July 2006, but Manitowoc County Circuit Judge Patrick Willis in April reversed the permit.

Willis ruled that the county Board of Adjustment failed to act “according to law” when the permit was approved because it did not apply to the Manitowoc County Wind Ordinance that took effect in May 2006.

The new ordinance requires a 1,000-foot setback for wind turbines from a neighbor’s property line.

On Wednesday, Emerging Energies partners Tim Osterberg and Bill Rakocy said none of the proposed 492-feet tall turbines meet the 1,000-foot setback requirement.

Emerging Energies hopes it can obtain easements or variances, or – with the possible help of money – woo neighbors into agreeing to a setback waiver, Osterberg and Rakocy said.

By Kevin Braley
Herald Times Reporter


17 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky