[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind energy project gets crucial OK; desert residents concerned 

A wind project that would add dozens of 327-foot turbines in and around Palm Springs moved forward Wednesday when the county approved turbines on one of the project’s three parcels.

The Riverside County Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the Dillon Wind project with its associated variances for unincorporated county land north of Palm Springs and west of Desert Hot Springs.

PPM Energy, based in Oregon, wants to erect about 45 wind turbines on the three rural parcels, but nearby residents say they are concerned about the potential for spoiled views, noise, declining home values and bird deaths. Some say they will appeal Wednesday’s decision.

“We know that not everyone agrees about the benefits of wind energy,” Andy Linehan, wind permitting director for PPM Energy, said after the heated meeting. “We hope that when they see it happen, they’ll find it’s not the horrible thing they think it is.”

The planning commission’s vote gave final approval for 620 acres east of Highway 62 and south of Two Bunch Palms Trail, although the decision could be appealed. The commission recommended approval for a second 690-acre parcel south of Two Bunch Palms Trail and west of Indian Avenue, but the county Board of Supervisors will make the final decision because it involves a zoning change.

The project’s third 200-acre parcel would be in the city of Palm Springs, which has not voted yet on the proposal.

PPM representatives say the project will cause minimal harm to wildlife, provide renewable and clean energy and take advantage of the area’s unique resources.

The planning commission postponed a vote on the project at its April 18 meeting after receiving a last-minute letter from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that requested more thorough studies of possible bird deaths.

County officials said Wednesday they had resolved that conflict, but residents said they were still worried about the environmental impact of adding another wind farm to the San Gorgonio Pass, which already has thousands of turbines.

One resident called the windmills “meat grinders.” Several people said they had seen birds and bats disappear as more turbines have gone up.

“You are relying on studies done by scientists and biologists employed by the windmill company,” said Michele McNeill, who lives near the proposed project. “How impartial can they be?”

By Julia Glick

The Press-Enterprise


16 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky