LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Public meeting on west Norfolk windfarm 

Hundreds of people are expected to attend a meeting to discuss controversial plans for a windfarm in west Norfolk.

Residents at Marshland St James are divided over plans to site wind turbines on farmland near the village.

Last week, a 300ft mast put up to measure wind speeds in the area was vandalised and the structure fell to the ground after its support wires were cut.

Hundreds of angry villagers packed into a public meeting last month and an action group was formed as part of an anti-windfarm campaign.

Now organisers of Fenland Landscape Against Turbines (FLAT) have organised another public meeting at Tilney St Lawrence Village Hall on Friday at 7pm.

Lyndon Mason, chairman of FLAT, said: “The meeting will be an opportunity for all those who attended our last meeting at Marshland Jubilee Hall to be updated on developments and to find out how they can be actively involved in opposing the plans.

“For those who did not attend our last meeting, this will be their chance to find out what adverse impact the wind turbine ‘factory’ could have on them both personally and their local community and landscape.”

The proposed windfarm has rocked the village amid claims of threats and intimidation to the consortium behind the plans. Since this, half the members of the Marshland Wind Farm Consortium have resigned citing “personal reasons”.

Villagers believed that up to 26 turbines could be built, but last week, a spokesman said the project would now be scaled down, despite the loss of key members from the consortium.

By Nicki Walker

edp24.co.uk

15 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky