[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Row as wind farm plan is changed  

The company preparing to build Suffolk’s first wind farm is seeking permission to install more powerful turbines – but the overall height of the structures will stay the same.

Under details just submitted to Suffolk Coastal District Council the rotor blades at the Parham wind farm, near Framlingham, will be longer and the six turbines will generate 25% more electricity than originally planned. However, the turbine tower will be shorter.

According to Your Energy, the developer, the total height of the turbines will remain at 100 metres and the new machines will be quieter at low wind speeds.

But the No Wind Farm at Parham (NOWAP) protest group said the change in design was in line with their claim that the original plans had been a “Trojan horse” ready to “smuggle in” bigger machines.

An application to the district council to vary a condition on the wind farm planning permission follows a ten-month-long tendering process and difficulty in finding a manufacturer able to meet construction deadlines because of the huge worldwide demand for turbines.

James Townsend, Your Energy’s senior development manager, said: “We have looked at the best turbine for the wind farm, and concluded that the Enercon E70 is the likely turbine to be installed.

“Parham Airfield will be a wind farm that will deliver clean energy equivalent to the needs of over 4,500 houses and something that Suffolk will be proud of.”

As part of the planning permission granted last July, Your Energy was asked to ensure that all finalised designs were considered by the district council to ensure they met the strict noise and visual criteria.

Mr Townsend said noise concerns had been an important consideration when the planning application was determined and Suffolk Coastal had imposed tougher limits than recommended by Government guidelines.

He added: “However we understand that this is what the council want and the turbine selected will be quieter at low wind speeds than originally proposed, so I believe that the council and nearby residents will be happy with our decision to select this turbine”

The proposed Enercon E70 is the same model of turbine Your Energy operates at its ten-turbine Burton Wold Wind Farm in Northamptonshire.

The company claims this has been running successfully for over a year “with none of the problems predicted by the minority of detractors before construction”.

The original plans for Parham were for six Bonus machines, 100m tall consisting of a 69m tower and 31 m blade.

The new turbines will still be 100m, with a shorter tower 64.5 metres high and a blade length of 35.5m, giving it a larger rotor diameter to catch more wind and generate more energy.

John Constable, chairman of NOWAP, said: “When the council originally granted permission for the Parham wind farm, local residents immediately warned them that this was a ‘Trojan Horse’ application intended to smuggle in a much larger turbine, and we even predicted that it would be the Enercon E70.

“This turbine has a bigger generator, much larger blades and swept area, causing increased visual impact and access problems, and a much lower cut-in speed with serious noise implications for near neighbours.”

Ivan Jowers, chairman of Suffolk Coastal’s development control committee, said the council would be launching a “full and wide-ranging” consultation about the application, giving all sections of the community the opportunity to air their views.

By David Green

eadt.co.uk

12 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: