[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm plan scaled back Redington out; Black Nubble mountains could sprout 18 turbines  

A company that was denied a permit to build a 30-turbine wind energy farm on mountains near Sugarloaf/USA has applied for approval of a scaled-down version of its proposal.

Last year, Yarmouth-based Maine Mountain Power proposed constructing a 30-turbine facility on Redington Pond Range and Black Nubble mountains.

In January, the Maine Land Use Regulation Commission, going against the recommendation of its staff, rejected the request to make a zoning change and approve a preliminary permit for the project.

On Wednesday, the company filed a new request and is asking LURC to reopen the public hearings on the project after eliminating the Redington Pond Range from its original proposal.

It is now asking for only 18 turbines on Black Nubble Mountain, which is further to the west and at a lower elevation than Redington Pond Range.

“The project would essentially remain the same, except that the Redington turbines and all project elements associated with Redington would be subtracted from the application, including Redington access and summit roads, power lines, and a collection system,” a statement by Maine Mountain Power said Wednesday.

Dennis Bailey, a spokesman for the project, said the new proposal puts all turbines at least three miles from the Appalachian Trail.

Trail advocates opposed the previous proposal saying it would impair the wilderness experience for hikers on the AT.

Also in opposition to the original proposal was Maine Audubon, which objected to the project’s impact on habitat for endangered species of birds, especially Bicknell’s thrush.

Bailey said the downsized project was an attempt at compromise, and it is hoped Maine’s environmental community will embrace it.

“We believe this reduced project will still provide many important environmental, economic and energy security benefits to Maine,” he said “At the same time, our proposal will restrict development on Redington and mitigate many of the concerns raised by the commissioners and opponents to the original project.”

The Natural Resources Council of Maine opposed putting turbines on Redington Pond Range but urged Maine Mountain Power to resubmit a proposal that only used Black Nubble. NRCM supports the Black Nubble plan, said NRCM Advocacy Director Pete Didisheim

“We think it strikes the right balance,” Didisheim said. “It provides protection for a 4,000-foot peak while moving forward with a significant renewable energy project for Maine.”

The threat of global climate change from the continued use of non-renewable sources of energy is an important factor in the NRCM’s support, Didisheim said.

“Most of the concerns raised about the project would be significantly reduced by limiting the turbines to Black Nubble,” Didisheim said. “There would be less road building, less habitat fragmentation, reduced risks to threatened species, and reduced visual impacts – yet Maine would still have the benefits of a significant new source of clean renewable power.”

By Scott Thistle
Regional Editor


10 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.