[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Developer proposes smaller wind farm near Sugarloaf  

The developer of a controversial wind farm proposed for Maine’s western mountains plans to submit a scaled-down version in hopes of winning approval from state regulators, the Land Use Regulation Commission said Wednesday.

Maine Mountain Power plans to drop its request for building 12 wind-power turbines on Redington Mountain. That would reduce the company’s proposal to 18 turbines located on Black Nubble Mountain.

Harley Lee with Endless Energy told members of the Land Use Regulation Commission that his company will outline the smaller wind project in a soon-to-be-sent letter. Yarmouth-based Endless Energy formed Maine Mountain Power with a California company.

In offering the revision, Maine Mountain Power is seeking to salvage a project that, as currently proposed, faces almost certain rejection.

LURC board members surprised the applicants and project supporters when, in January, they requested that staff submit a document denying the proposal. LURC staff had recommended approving the $130 million project.

The project had divided environmentalists, conservationists and outdoor enthusiasts in the state.

Supporters praised the Redington project as a way to produce enough clean, emissions-free energy to power up to 40,000 homes. But opponents predicted that the project would spoil the views from nearby Sugarloaf/USA ski resort and from the Appalachian Trail.

Lee said the company is also prepared to place the land on Redington Mountain in conservation.

LURC director Catherine Carroll said Wednesday that her staff is working to prepare a new recommendation on the original project in time for the commission’s June meeting.

It was unclear Wednesday how the commission would proceed with the application after receiving details of the proposed revisions.

By Kevin Miller


3 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.