[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

No wind farm for Rehoboth  

Town meeting voters Monday shot down a proposal to study the feasibility of creating a town-owned wind farm.

Although wind power is an environmentally-friendly energy source and could potentially generate considerable revenue for the town, voters decided that putting a wind farm on the land near the Almeida Farm on Interstate 195 could pose a danger to the wetlands on the 22-acre parcel.

John Ferreira, who donated the land to the town for conservation use, spoke against the proposed wind farm.

“The land is 100 percent wetland,” he said. “I think a little more research should be done with the conservation commission. I am 100 percent sure the town cannot build on this land.”

Proponents of the wind farm said there is a considerable amount of dry land on the 22-acre plot.

Town Executive Secretary David Marciello spoke in favor of the wind farm feasibility study. He said the location is the only one in Rehoboth that could potentially support a wind farm, based on wind mapping and computer models.
The proposal would have authorized the town to spend $25,000 to erect a meteorological tower to gather detailed information on the wind speeds at the location.

“There are exemptions,” Marciello said. “Just because something’s a wetland doesn’t mean you can’t build on it. It’s just another hoop you have to go through.”

Ken Nickerson, a consultant with Plymouth-based Alternate Energy, spoke in favor of the feasibility study and the proposed location, echoing many of Marciello’s remarks. The article was also endorsed by the Finance Committee and the Board of Selectmen.

“The potential benefit to the town is free electricity along with additional revenue,” Finance Committee member Sue Pimental said.

“We’re talking hundreds of thousands of dollars a year,” Marciello said.
Many residents spoke against the proposal.

“You cannot build in the state of Massachusetts on wetlands,” said Ken Abram, a former Conservation Commission member.

In other business, the town narrowly defeated a measure that would allocate $38,900 to Nike Park. Former State Rep. Philip Travis, a town resident, said he was on the Board of Selectmen in 1975 when the state gave the park to the town.

“That’s 32 years ago, and we haven’t spent any further money on it,” he said, adding that Rehoboth lacks public recreation lands.

The proposal got 101 votes in favor, and 58 votes against, but since it was slated to be funded from the town stabilization account, a two-thirds majority vote was required. That mark was narrowly missed.

In other news, the town approved a $50,000 allocation to the Rehoboth Agricultural and Natural Resources Preservation Trust Fund.

By Gerry Tuoti, Staff Writer
GateHouse Media


30 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.