[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Try multi-category search (beta) »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Voters' OK needed for $92,000 outlay on feasibility study  

Hanover’s interest in wind energy is about to be tested.

At town meeting early next month, residents will weigh in on the idea of building three wind turbines. Selectmen will be seeking approval for a $92,000 wind-power feasibility study.

Hanover is looking at the turbines as a potential power source for its public water wells and water treatment plant.

Several town committees are in favor of the study, which would determine how and where the town could build windmills.

Completion of the study would clear the way for turbine construction, Selectmen Chairman Alan Rugman said.

More than a dozen other South Shore communities, including Braintree, Cohasset, Kingston, Marshfield, Milton, Norwell, Pembroke, Plymouth, Scituate, Quincy and Weymouth, are exploring the use of wind energy. Hull has two turbines and wants to add at least four.

Hanover officials do not think the town would need to study wind patterns before building turbines.

The town’s consultant, Sustainable Energy Developments Inc., already has wind data for Hanover, Rugman said.

Still, nothing will be built without public hearings and approval from town meeting, Rugman said.

“˜”˜These are just studies being done,” he said. “˜”˜We’ll have to come back to town meeting to go through the next step, too.”

A top concern in Hanover is where the turbines would be built. Two of the proposed sites are near homes.

The public works board, which runs the town’s water utility, thinks a wind turbine would be ideal at its Pond Street water treatment plant because the plant is far from homes and businesses, Public Works Superintendent Victor Diniak said.

The public works board must approve the sites before any turbines are built. So far, its support for the two other windmills is unclear, Diniak said.

“˜”˜The other sites (on Beal Street and Broadway) are closer to homes,” he said, “˜”˜so the board of public works is more guarded about that.”

By Andrew Lightman
The Patriot Ledger


25 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.