LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind power unpopular, mandated, subsidized 

The (April 1) Gazette article about the challenges of integrating wind power was accurate but ignores underlying problems and glosses over the warts.

Jan Falstad said that wind had gone from being “technologically challenged and too expensive – to being a popular and mandated goal.” Perhaps more accurately, it should have read, “Wind has gone from being technically challenged and too expensive – to being technically challenged, mandated and taxpayer subsidized.”

If wind power were really popular, we would not need Gov. Schweitzer putting it in the law that we must buy it. Only uncompetitive sources of power are mandated. Only 3/10th of 1 percent of NWE’s customer base willingly pay 50 cents per week extra to support “green power.”

NWE and the PSC have long known about the fines ratepayers face because of the line imbalance caused by Judith Gap. Yet PSC Commissioner Jergeson, while acknowledging the errors of his vote on Judith Gap, just recently voted for 50 MW more of wind. I wish Falstad had asked him about this apparent discrepancy.

Fortunately, our commissioner Brad Molnar stood alone against both Judith Gap and the 50 additional megawatts because they shifted the risks and costs from the developers to the ratepayers. Eventually, he was joined by Commissioner Doug Mood. Unfortunately, the three Democratic commissioners decided that consumers would just have to bear it. And so we shall.

Caroll Smith
Billings

billingsgazette.net

24 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky