[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Try multi-category search (beta) »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Big profits in wind turbines  

Anti wind farm protester John Stoneman told a public meeting in the Fens that if permission was given for 26 turbines the owners could make annual profits of £6 million.

“I think people should realise we are not talking about wind farms- that’s got too nice a feel to what they are really about,” said Mr Stoneman. “A more accurate description would be wind factories.”

Mr Stoneman was among 300 protesters who packed Marshland St James Village Hall to vent their anger over recently announced proposals for wind turbines to be put up in the village.

“I am sorry to hear your community and its environment is about to be ‘turbinised’, industrialised and hi-jacked by the wind industry,” said Mr Stoneman.

“The impact on local landscape, skyline, wildlife and people is echoed nationally as this vandalisation of our rural way of life gathers momentum.”

Mr Stoneman said the group behind the proposals, The Marshland Renewable Energy Consortium, proposes to stall 130 high wind turbines at a cost of nearly £50 million.

“After a commissioned life of 25 years, the Marshland wind factory will show a staggering profit of £156 million, and the most nauseating aspect of this grotesque amount is that fact that taxpayers subsidy up to 70 per cent of their construction,” he said.

Villagers pledged hundreds of pounds to fund a campaign against the proposed new wind farm.

Campaigner Dave McGuffog, of Bourne Blinds, Wisbech, said: “These things are monsters.

“Twenty six of them would make it the biggest development in the East of England on acreage.

“I’ve never met anyone yet who is in favour of these turbines.”

Mr McGuffog said two consultants employed by the consortium were at the meeting, but that they had failed to quell people’s fears.

A spokesman for Renewable Energy said: “We have looked into the possibility of building wind turbines on our land and it appears that it may be viable to do so.


24 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.