LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

King Ranch takes on wind farms; Land giant's opposition to turbines adds to growing movement 

Taylor County landowners who went to court to fight a wind farm built in their neighborhoods may have gained a powerful ally in potential future battles: the fabled King Ranch of South Texas.

The ranch ownership, now a corporate holding company, is fighting a proposed wind farm next to one of its spreads in Kenedy County.

A group of Taylor County landowners, mainly residents of the southwest quadrant of the county, lost a jury trial last December. They sued Florida Power & Light affiliates, owner of the Horse Hollow project west of Tuscola and Buffalo Gap. The landowners sought damages for reduced property values they claimed were caused by the building of the wind farm, the world’s largest.

Steve Thompson, the Houston lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said he was filing a notice of appeal of the 42nd District Court case on Wednesday. The 11th Court of Appeals in Eastland would hear the appeal.

Dale Rankin, a lead plaintiff in the case, said King Ranch should prove a potent ally.

”I would think so,” he said Wednesday. ”They carry a little bit of weight around Austin.”

State Rep. Robert Puente, a San Antonio Democrat, has filed a bill to require the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to regulate the location of wind projects to protect a variety of interests. They include endangered, threatened or migratory wildlife; neighboring property owners; Indian religious sites; and significant historical, architectural, engineering or cultural locations. Proposed location in floodplains, tornado zones and hurricane zones would also be considered by the TCEQ.

King Ranch has been battling a proposed coastal wind farm in Kenedy County, just east of its ranch, the Austin American-Statesman reported Wednesday. The project would place 267 turbines along the Gulf’s Laguna Madre, the newspaper reported.

Jack Hunt, chief executive officer of King Ranch Inc., said Texans should step back from the wind rush, which he called a frenzy, the American-Statesman reported.

”People need to take a deep breath and think a little,” the Austin newspaper quoted Hunt as saying.

Puente’s measure, HB 2794, has been referred to a subcommittee of the House Regulated Industries Committee. A public hearing scheduled last Thursday was postponed.

Texas Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson, an ardent advocate of wind power who has leased state land on the Gulf Coast for the placement of wind turbines, has bluntly declared opposition to his bill, Puente said.

”He said he was going to do what he could to not let it pass,” the lawmaker said.

Rankin scoffed at Patterson’s stance, which includes an assertion that Puente’s bill is dead.

”He’s just a pro-wind nut; he’s just a zealot,” Rankin said, adding he thinks his cause will ultimately be successful. ”It’s going to happen in the Legislature; it’s going to happen in the courts,” he predicted.

The appeal from the December verdict in 42nd District Court will result in a retrial in Taylor County, Rankin predicted. In any new trial, he hopes that evidence of ”visual pollution” created by the turbines, and the resulting hit to property values, will be allowed. In the first trial, District Judge John Weeks excluded such evidence.

Calls to Florida Power & Light representatives were not immediately returned Wednesday.

By Jerry Daniel Reed
Edited: Patti Steele; headline and copy editor: Jeff Wolf

reporter-news.com

29 March 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky