[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Gamesa proposes 13 more windmills in northern Cambria County  

More than a third of the 35 proposed windmills in the second phase of the largest wind farm in Pennsylvania will be constructed in Cambria County, while the remainder will be placed in neighboring Blair County, local officials learned.

Of the 13 planned for Cambria, nine will be in Portage Township and four in Washington Township, Terry Nicol, a representative for wind-energy developer Gamesa Inc., said of the North Allegheny Wind Farm LLC.

“We will be building further west than last year,” Nicol told Washington Township supervisors.

The nine planned for Portage Township also will be built further west, toward the Lilly area, Nicol said.

In a request for approval of local ordinances needed for construction, Nicol outlined details of the second phase for officials in the two townships.

As part of the process, supervisors in both townships approved development agreements with Gamesa.

Property setbacks, allowable noise levels from the turbines and decommission guarantees mirror pacts between the municipalities and Gamesa that were reached two years ago for Allegheny Ridge Wind Farm LLC, the first phase.

In addition, Gamesa agrees to pay each municipality an annual fee of $3,000 for each of the towers.

When the second phase is completed, 23 turbines will be in Portage Township and 14 in Washington.

Nicol said timber removal for the second phase could start when weather permits.

A third phase, Allegheny Wind Expansion, would put 15 more turbines on the ridge dividing Cambria and Blair counties. Construction could start next year, though Nicol said plans are not definite.

Few problems have been reported on Route 164, the main access route to the first and second phases of construction in Portage Township.

While in Washington Township, the contractor again will be allowed to use Mountain Road, but only if Gamesa is more responsive than last year in dealing with dust problems from the un-paved section, Supervisor Ray Guzic said.

The supervisors fielded complaints from residents about road deterioration and dust issues. While Gamesa made corrections, local officials said the response was too slow.

“Many phone calls were made to you. One of the biggest problems was the dust,” Washington Solicitor Thomas Swope told Nicol and Ellen Lutz, Gamesa’s director of development. “There were multiple requests for water trucks that never came.”

Lutz said Gamesa will make sure contractors know dust control is a priority.

By Kathy Mellott
The Tribune-Democrat


22 March 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.