[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Guidelines to be set for windfarms cash  

Wind farm development in the Borders has been as controversial as elsewhere in the country, but one thing communities in the region are agreed about is that any community benefit payments made by the developers should go to the settlements most affected.

Proposals to have a centrally administered fund have been rejected by a majority of community councils in the Borders and now Scottish Borders Council is looking at drawing up guidelines – A Community Benefits Toolkit – to provide a voluntary protocol for both communities and developers to follow while negotiating payments.

The toolkit, based on the model used in the Highlands, will consist of: information on windfarm development in the Borders; making contact with windfarm developers/community interests; options for community benefit payments; a model strategic management agreement (SMA); allocation of resources; and sources of support/information.

Scottish Borders Council drew up a draft guidelines framework in September last year and have been consulting with communities since then.

Reporting to councillors this week, Susan Dean, environmental strategy co-ordinator, said: “From examining the responses and given the voluntary nature of community benefit payments it can be concluded that it will be difficult and not necessarily constructive to establish a one-size-fits-all governance framework for community benefits payments.

“Each development is different and each ‘community’ differs with the variation in the scale of development, number of community interests involved and topography to name but a few factors.

“However, as there was general support for codifying arrangements for the negotiation and disbursement of community benefit payments it would seem appropriate to devise a mechanism for achieving this in a less prescriptive and centralised manner.”

It is assumed that developers will negotiate directly with the community, with the council’s development negotiations officer acting as a support for those communities that request help.

It will be up to the individual communities and windfarm developers/operators as to how any money is disbursed. Community organisations will need to establish processes to manage and administer the fund themselves and it will be up to them and the developers as to who should be included in individual schemes.

The argument against a Borders wide scheme was that it was “inappropriate for all parts of the Borders to benefit – the distances are too vast and the closest communities could be disadvantaged by larger or more active communities which are further away”.

Communities were also against setting a specific distance that could be included in the benefits as it could not take into account local variation such as topography and population distribution.

Community councils were broadly in favour of eligible projects being limited to those not covered by normal tax or government funding and that they should decide for themselves what the money should be spent on.

The Community Benefits Toolkit will make it clear that the community benefit payment is not a compensation payment and will be completely separate from the planning process.


16 March 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.