[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind project on hold for now  

An experimental project involving the installation and testing of a single, giant wind turbine in Pelican Township was postponed yesterday when the developer notified township authorities that he could no longer secure the turbine.

“I am disappointed that I am going to have to rescind my pursuit of a wind turbine permit because the turbine is no longer available,” developer John Ihle of Plains States Energy said to the township’s board of supervisors Monday.

Named the Pelican Township Wind Project, the planned construction in Section 20 was an experimental project “of a single wind turbine in a size which has previously not been built,” according to notes taken at the township’s Feb. 8 meeting, where the proposal was first introduced.

The turbine would have been mounted atop a 260-foot tall tower, with a rotor mounted spanning 300 feet. The purpose of the experiment was to determine the value of installing a more powerful turbine than has typically been mated with the system.

“We were working with (Ihle) on this,” Otter Tail Power Company Director of Public Relations Cris Kling said. “The idea was that Otter Tail Power would purchase the output. But (Ihle) pulled the project. That is our understanding.”

“If I have another opportunity with Otter Tail Power and the manufacturer,” Ihle said, “I will be very well prepared with the information the board had asked me to provide. I may get that opportunity in 2008.”

The township board would be receptive to Ihle proposing the project again, according to Supervisor Thomas Langseth, provided the proper permit requests and preliminary information is supplied.

“We have some requirements that we need before we can grant any permits,” he said.

By Matt Bewley
The Daily Journal


13 March 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.