LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bills would allow wind projects to avoid review 

The sponsors of House Bill 1078 and Senate Bill 566 should be ashamed of their attempt to allow wind developers to circumvent the Public Service Commission’s (PSC) review process.

If enacted, the people most affected by these massive developments would effectively lose their rights of notification and the opportunity to be heard. Environmental, historic, economic and other such reviews would no longer be required.

Beyond the blatant disregard for public participation and regulatory review of industrial development are the following sleaze factors: The bills were quietly introduced at the last moment; the respective committee hearings were held simultaneously, potentially diluting opposition; Wayne Rogers, former chair of the Maryland Democratic Central Committee, who seeks to profit personally from the measures as a wind developer, Senate President Mike Miller and prominent wind lobbyist Cas Taylor are long-time political associates. Moreover, the new governor has named Wayne Rogers to head his energy transition team, aware that Rogers has a personal financial stake in wind energy – and thus, a conflict of interest.

All this despite being aware of the fact that industrial wind technology will do nothing to replace conventional generation and virtually nothing to avoid carbon emissions.

The stench from this is palpable, drifting all the way to Garrett County. Thanks to Sen. Edwards and Delegate Beitzel, who have both gone on record as opposing these putrid bills.

Kimberly A. Connaughton, Oakland

times-news.com

11 March 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky