[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Protesters call for twin probe 

Protesters fighting two controversial windfarm applications in Northumberland say both should be reviewed at the same public inquiry.

Planners at Alnwick District Council last week rejected their own officers’ advice to raise no objections to the 18- turbine scheme at Middlemoor, South Charlton.

They felt that the 125m-high structures – put forward by npower renewables – would ruin an unspoiled landscape and impact on tourism to the area.

Their decision now opens the way for a full public inquiry into the development, which will ultimately be decided by the Department for Trade and Industry.

But their Berwick council counterparts are now preparing to consider 10 further turbines by RidgeWind Ltd at Wandylaw, immediately adjacent to the Middlemoor site.

That decision will be determined by Berwick Borough Council. Speaking yesterday, key protesters living next to the sites said the Wandylaw bid should be part of the Middlemoor public inquiry.

“It’s the only sensible thing to do,” said Robert Thorp, who farms and has holiday chalets at South Charlton. “To go ahead and consider Wandylaw when Middlemoor is subject to a public inquiry would be premature.

“While the planning processes are different for each application, the factors determining them are identical.

“The turbines involved are the same height and the same size, and they will have a joint impact on the surrounding countryside.

Mr Thorp added: “They cannot be separated, and together they will form the biggest wind-farm in England and Wales. That must be considered and, we say, only a public inquiry will do.” Belford parish councillor Geoff O’Connell added: “Where the whole thing is going wrong is that the county council is viewing windfarm applications one at a time, rather than looking at the bigger picture.

“No-one seems to be taking an overview on this issue.

“Now that Middlemoor is going to a public consultation, the county must carefully consider how they deal with Wandylaw.”

The Texan businesswoman behind Wandylaw, Marjorie Neasham Glasgow, pledged “hundreds of thousands of pounds” worth of benefits for local communities at a public exhibition held in 2005.

But over 1,500 signatures have been raised against the plan.

By Robert Brookes
The Journal


5 March 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky