[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind farm consent quashed over noise condition technicality  

Consent for a small wind farm development in Norfolk has been quashed by the High Court and sent back to Communities Secretary Ruth Kelly for reconsideration after a judge agreed that a planning condition about noise was “unenforceable and imprecise”.

The two-turbine Ecotricity scheme at the village of Shipdham was granted permission on appeal last summer after being turned down by Breckland District Council.

Two villagers who live next to the proposed wind farm site took legal action to challenge that permission. After a brief hearing, the judge, Mr Justice Lloyd Jones, approved an order – agreed between the Secretary of State, the developer and the local planning authority – quashing the permission.

Now a planning inspector must decide whether to hold a third inquiry into the project, accept a redrafted noise condition or reject the proposal.

Ecotricity chief executive Dale Vince insisted the glitch over the condition was a technicality, in a planning saga stretching back to December 2001 when an application for the scheme was originally lodged.

He said: “We have just been through a process no less arduous or expensive than if we had applied to build a nuclear power station – and all for two turbines, it’s crazy”.

Meanwhile, the British Wind Energy Association has expressed concern that approval rates for wind schemes have fallen significantly.

The association is about to publish new data which shows that of the 18 planning decisions made on onshore wind project proposals since October 2006, 12 were refusals.

By Roger Milne

planningportal.gov.uk

1 March 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: