[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Go to multi-category search »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Windfarm protest gets powerful backing  

The Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) has joined local efforts to stop a windfarm being built on the edge of a Norfolk village.

It says the proposed wind turbines at Hempnall would damage a beautiful part of the countryside it dubs the heart of rural Norfolk, and destroy an area to be included in its national rural tranquillity campaign.

Norfolk-based Enertrag UK wants to build seven turbines, each 130m tall, and is engaged in a public consultation process with villagers. A planning application will not be submitted until the end of the year.

Opponents to the renewable-energy scheme welcomed the backing of their campaign by the CPRE.

But it came on the day that government figures revealed wind-farms capable of producing the equivalent of 11 gigawatts of environ-mentally-friendly energy were being delayed by planning disputes.

The number of windfarms in planning limbo is equal to 8pc of UK electricity supply, or more than the output of the UK’s biggest coal-fired power station, Drax in North Yorkshire.

Since May last year, only five of 21 windfarms up before local authority planning committees have been approved.

As a result, the chances are diminishing of the UK meeting its pledge to have 10pc of electricity powered by renewable energy – and thereby helping in the battle against climate change – by 2010.

Hilary Battye, spokesman for Hempnall pressure group Showt, said: “These gigantic wind station structures will not only ruin the local landscape but will also seriously damage the precious amenity of Hempnall’s rural tranquillity.”

By Tom Smithard


26 February 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.