[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Councillors view turbine plan stance  

Dunedin city councillors will decide today whether to lodge a submission on Trust-Power’s Mahinerangi wind farm proposal.

A special meeting of the planning and environment committee has been scheduled to discuss the council’s response to the 100-turbine wind farm proposal planned on land near Lake Mahinerangi next to a council-owned water catchment reserve.

The company has a resource consent application with the Clutha District Council and submissions close on March 2. The special meeting as been scheduled because the planning and environment committee does not meet again until March 5.

The most likely outcome of today’s meeting is that the council will lodge a submission. However, councillors will also have to decide today whether the submission supports or opposes the consent application, or takes a neutral stance. The council has already lodged a submission opposing Meridian Energy’s Project Hayes 176-turbine wind farm on the Lammermoor Range, about 25km north of the Trust-Power site.

In his report to today’s meeting, city council resource consents manager Alan Worthington said the most significant effect of the TrustPower wind farm would be the highly visible turbines.

Council landscape architect Barry Knox, who was asked to review the application, said while some people would perceive the turbines as a positive feature and focal point, others would see them as an unwelcome intrusion into a landscape with openness, wilderness and isolation values.

Other matters the council could address in its submission were increased fire risk to councilowned land and increased heavy traffic during construction of the farm, the potential for changes to the area’s rural character, and noise from rotating turbines (although this was not expected to be significant), Mr Worthington said.

Water and waste department staff had considered the application and concluded the wind farm would not have an adverse effect on the water catchment reserve, he said.

He recommended the council put in a submission and included a two-page draft version for consideration.

By Allison Rudd


21 February 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.