[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Redington wind turbines would scar mountains  

In regard to the Redington Wind Farm Project.

I am truly thankful that Land Use Regulation Commission’s (LURC) progressive regulations prohibited any zoning change of Maine Mountain Power’s land that would have allowed the construction of 30 wind turbines on Redington Mountain and Black Nubble peaks. The applicant didn’t demonstrate that its project would fit harmoniously into the existing natural environment, that the change satisfies a demonstrated need in the area, and that the project has no undue adverse impact on existing uses and resources. Clearly, these requirements could not be met.

LURC’s charge is to preserve scenic values, resources and vistas that are coming under increasing pressure and cannot be replaced, the increasing concern of ridgeline development, defining clearing standards, reducing light pollution, fitting projects harmoniously into the landscape, and allowing no adverse impacts on existing uses and resources. They do recognize the tremendous value of our high mountain areas and understand that it is its duty to protect and preserve these resources.

We respect LURC commissioners for abiding by their laws in the face of such huge pressure. Hundreds of us work endlessly to foster an atmosphere where our economy here in Western Maine can flourish. We are grateful not to receive a crushing blow to these efforts, not significantly devalue hundreds of homes in Western Maine, and not scar our beautiful mountains forever. It’s encouraging to know the system does work well here in Maine.

Mary Henderson



17 February 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.