[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Pro-wind farm group hits out at council decision to fight Ecotricity appeal  

Angry members of a Burnham-On-Sea ‘green’ group who are in favour of controversial plans to build a wind farm on the outskirts of the town have this week hit out at councillors for spending £2,000 on fighting the scheme.

In a letter sent to Burnham-On-Sea.com, FORCE (Families For Clean Energy) says it “strongly objects” to the town council spending public funds on fighting the appeal by Ecotricity – the company behind the project – following last year’s decision by Sedgemoor planners to reject its application for five wind turbines.

Burnham-On-Sea.com was first to report last week that town councillors had voted in favour of proceeding with a joint bid with Brent Knoll Parish Council to fight Ecotricity’s plans.

Now, FORCE has published an open latter signed by 40 residents saying: “It has come to our attention that Burnham and Highbridge Town Council is using £2,000 of taxpayers money – our money – to fight the Edithmead wind farm appeal. This will be topped up by an additional £2,000 from Brent Knoll Parish Council.”

“We, members of FORCE and Burnham and Highbridge ratepayers, strongly object to our money being used in this way. We see it as a desperate move which does not have the support of most local people. Indeed, polls have shown that a majority of locals are either not opposed to wind power or actively support it.”

“The ‘Nimbys’ are very vociferous and manipulative but are only a minority. As regards house prices, a study by the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors showed that prices do take a dip but then recover.”

“Nor is there a business case against the wind farm. In fact the recent Fullabrook Public Inquiry confirmed that wind farms are good for tourism. Is local ratepayers’ money to be spent against the interests of the many traders who rely on local visitors who, it appears, like wind mills?”

“Most importantly, the wind farm development is an opportunity for us, including our civic leaders, to pledge support for clean and renewable energy. We should be proud of the contribution we can make towards the national targets. We would be amongst the first in Somerset to be doing our bit. Instead we have the predictable and depressing knee jerk reaction from those who purport to represent us.”

“Hurray for Chris Williams, the only councillor with sufficient fibre and foresight to vote against the herd.”

“We encourage people who really care about clean energy to write to the politicians and media and voice their objections to the use of public money for these partisan ends. We should all certainly think carefully next time we cast our votes in local elections.”


13 February 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.