[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbines, appointment dominate Amaranth council 

Amaranth Township Council’s public question period Wednesday was dominated by concerns about wind turbines, and accusations of irregular handling of a public appointment to the arena board.

Former mayor Bob Currie, who had served on the board during 12 of his years on the council, had been one of two applicants for the advertised arena position.

The council had selected an applicant from Waldemar for the position, rather than Mr. Currie. The Waldemar appointee subsequently resigned the post.

At the council meeting Wednesday, Mr. Currie said he had evidence that the deputy mayor had then made at least one phone call seeking a new applicant for the position.

Deputy Mayor Walter Kolodziechuk denied he had done so, but that he had been “out in the community” (when the topic arose), whereupon Mr. Currie – in his colourful fashion – accused the deputy mayor of being, in more polite terms, untruthful.

Mayor Don MacIver appeared shocked by the revelation that any member had spoken to anyone about the appointment.

“I should have known of this before the meeting,” he said, adding that the position “was advertised. There is no change from the process. We will not be searching for other candidates. You’re the man of the hour.”

Mr. Currie, however, indicated he no longer wanted to serve as a council appointee to the arena board. Additionally, he accused the council of fiscal irresponsibility in having appointed someone from Waldemar – a round-trip of 40 miles – rather than someone within a round trip of eight, in view of mileage charges.

On turbines, a resident had concerns that the township would be getting “1,041,” on the basis of a flyer she had received in her mailbox.

Mayor MacIver assured the lady that, although he was aware that several companies were negotiating leases, there had not been approaches to the council by many of those.

The flyer “notice” did not come from the Township, but a notice of an impending Ontario Municipal Board pre-hearing on the 15th did.

The mayor said the council is following a “systematic” planning procedure in considering turbines. “The properties have to be individually zoned,” he said.

By Wes Keller
Freelance Reporter
8 February 2007


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky