LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Setback for Pirelli's wind turbine plans 

Plans for a giant wind turbine at Carlisle’s Pirelli factory have been dealt a blow as tests found the city is not as windy as first thought.

A test mast was erected at the Dalston Road factory last year to measure wind strength and how often it blows, as a precursor to a planned 120-metre turbine.

But results have not matched the company’s expectations.

Those calculations were based on wind records taken at Carlisle airport over the past ten years.

But Pirelli’s UK boss, Wolfgang Meier, said the project was still very much alive.

“There is no cause for alarm,” he said.

“At this stage we need more windy months to prove our calculations.

“The project is still part of our plans.”

Data from the 45-metre test mast is being analysed by a team specially set up at the Dalston Road factory and by the company that built it ““ London-based Windforce Energy.

It is hoped when built, that the £2m turbine will generate 20 per cent of the tyre plant’s energy and create savings of £700,000 a year.

It would stand a third taller than Dixon’s Chimney in the city and three times the height of the Civic Centre.

Pirelli says it wants to build the turbine because of spiralling energy costs, which have risen from £2.5m a year two years ago to £5m.

Former boss John Nixon said at the time of Pirelli’s planning application for the turbine that it was vital for the future of the Carlisle factory.

Mr Meier said that was not the case.

“It will only provide 20 per cent of our energy ““ it is not essential,” he added.

By Matthew Legg

7 February 2007

newsandstar.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky