[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Burying mega-power line would force total rethink, inquiry is told 

Controversial plans to build an overhead power line through Scotland are both necessary and cost effective, an inquiry was told yesterday.

The scheme is also “demonstrably more economic” than putting the line underground, according to the would-be developers.

They warned that if parts of the line had to be buried, the whole scheme would have to be re-evaluated because of the extra costs involved.

The inquiry opened in Perth into proposals to replace the existing 137-mile electricity transmission line between Beauly near Inverness, and Denny, near Stirling, to help take power from planned renewable energy developments.

But the scheme by Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission (SHETL), a subsidiary of Scottish & Southern Energy (SSE); and SP Transmission, a subsidiary of ScottishPower, has met objections from the five planning authorities involved – Highland, Perth and Kinross, Stirling and Falkirk councils, and the Cairngorms National Park Authority.

More than 17,000 people have also protested and a number of campaign groups have been formed to fight the plans, claiming the new line will threaten health, landscape, tourism, wildlife and property values.

The proposed £320 million, 400,000-volt transmission line would replace the 132,000-volt line. It would use about 600 pylons – some 200 fewer than in the one it will replace – but they will be more than 20 metres higher at 67 metres (200ft).

The inquiry’s first witness, David Densley, SHETL’s regulations manager, said the energy regulator Ofgem had considered the plan and seen it as necessary and economic.

He said the planned overhead route was demonstrably more economic than going underground, as campaigners are calling for.

Mr Densley said the electricity companies would recoup the cost of the upgrade over 20 years. However, if the inquiry reporters decided some or all of the line had to be put underground, the companies would have to return to Ofgem to seek approval for more funding.

He said that as Ofgem’s main concern was to protect prices to customers, the regulator would be keen to cap the cost as ultimately this would find its way back on to electricity bills.

The inquiry is set to become the longest ever in Scotland, with 29 weeks set aside over the next 11 months, and will cost an estimated £10 million.

The first eight weeks will be taken up with SHETL making the case for the upgrade. The inquiry will then move to Inverness in May and June; Kingussie in August and September; back to Perth during October and November; and then Stirling in November and December.

Before evidence started yesterday Colin Hood, SSE’s operating officer, said

: “We believe (the plans) are strongly founded and will eventually receive the go-ahead. It is vital that they do, because the country’s goals for greener and more indigenous sources of energy depend on it.”

However, it has been claimed the inquiry will waste time and money and discredit the planning system.

Highland Council has questioned whether communities and pressure groups will be able to attend much of the inquiry and be properly represented.

By John Ross


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky