[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Try multi-category search (beta) »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Criticisms heard at windfarm inquiry  

Around 100 people turned out when a windfarm public inquiry moved to the Isle of Axholme for the evening.

The inquiry into two proposed windfarms in the region moved from its venue in Goole to Seven Lakes Country Park, Ealand. More than 20 residents made representations to the inquiry inspector, each time cheered and clapped by members of public.

Owners of homes and businesses close to the proposed 34 turbine site between Keadby and Crowle highlighted issues of water levels, noise pollution, visual impact, devaluing of property and concerns about increased volume of traffic during construction.

Richard Nixon, of North Axholme Against Windfarms (NAAWF), opened the proceedings, citing the sheer size of the proposed turbines as problematic to drivers on the A18.

He claimed the road was already particularly hazardous. The distraction and draw of the ‘massive’ structures would add to the problems, he said.

Tony Kassner, a Bonnyhale Road resident, explained how he had objected to the proposals on six grounds – visual impact, noise pollution, electronic interference, increased traffic, light flicker and reduction in property value.

A request was made by Renewable Energy Systems’ (RES) QC, Andrew Newcombe, for the gathered crowd to cease applauding the speakers.

However, inquiry inspector Keith Smith disagreed with him and said he believed it to be part of the proceedings, so long as control was maintained.

Many questions were levelled at the representatives for RES.

In response to ensuing criticism for not answering, Mr Newcombe said: “I thank all the speakers for their input but do not wish to go over ground which has already been presented to the inspector.”

Mr Smith also explained why the venue was swapped for an evening, and why there was no responsibility to ask questions of those making representations.

He said: “It is not a question-and-answer session but is for me to gauge the opinion of local residents.”

Goole Times

1 February 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.