[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

ACW waiting for EPCOR response  

Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh Township council is not pleased that EPCOR is not responding to the public’s concerns.

“EPCOR is not coming through with the information we have asked for,” said Reeve Ben Van Diepenbeek, following council’s Jan. 16 meeting.

Van Diepenbeek said the public continues to address concerns to council of noise and of EPCOR not responding to their concerns. He said township resident Ross Brindley has also expressed concerns of stray voltage in his barn which he says were not there until after the wind turbines were built.

Administrator/clerk-treasurer Mark Becker contacted Rob Vader, manager of field technical services for Hydro One, who acknowledged that they have been looking into the issues raised by Brindley. Becker reported that Vader indicated their review of the property would ensure that Hydro One’s equipment and system is working properly and that they would not be commenting on the wind turbines themselves.

Susan Shaw from EPCOR was present at the recent meeting and asked by council to have the public’s verbal concerns addressed and followed up with a report to council. Council further instructed staff to send an official letter to EPCOR requesting information and clarification on stray voltage concerns, a noise study completion and a decommissioning agreement.

Council also received further correspondence from the Ministry of Environment (MOE) about frequently asked questions, interpretation for applying MOE technical publications to wind turbine generators and sound level limits.

Council also received a copy of South Huron’s wind energy facility regulations and a letter from township residents Wolfgang and Lyn Guenther expressing their opinion on the wind turbine provisions bylaw.

At the previous meeting, council requested Chief Building Official Kirk Livingston to gather information from other municipalities who have wind turbine development. Livingston presented his findings at the council meeting.

One report was from the Township of Melancthon (Shelburne area) where 50 (1.5 MW) wind turbine generators in operation. The turbines have a setback of 350 meters from off site dwelling and smaller setbacks from property lines than proposed in ACW. At present, they have had no written complaints.

Huron-Kinloss Township recently approved the construction of 38 (2.0 MW) wind turbines and the closet off site dwelling is 430 metres.

Prince Edward County had a proposal for 34 turbines in 2000 which received strong opposition. In 2002 a new developer proposed the construction of turbines which is still under appeal to the OMB.

Van Diepenbeek said council is now “contemplating” whether to pass the setback bylaw at their next council meeting on Feb. 6 that was first presented at the Sept. 19 council meeting. He added that council is not making any changes to the bylaw but the bylaw will be passed at a future meeting date. An advertisement will be placed in the local papers as a consideration to all those parties affected.

By Sara Bender
Signal-Star Publishing
Wednesday January 31, 2007

goderichsignalstar.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter