LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Critics say Redington wind power recommendation is illegal 

A group of environmental and hiking organizations claimed Thursday that a recommendation by the staff of Maine’s wilderness zoning board to approve a controversial wind power project in the state’s western mountains is illegal.

But the groups, including Maine Audubon and the Appalachian Mountain Club, stopped short of vowing to initiate a court challenge if the Land Use Regulation Commission gives the green light to the plan to build 30 wind turbines on Redington Pond Range and Black Nubble Mountain.

LURC is scheduled to vote on Maine Mountain Power’s application Wednesday in Farmington. The commission usually, but not always, goes along with staff recommendations.

At a news conference, Jenn Burns of Maine Audubon said the proposal failed to demonstrate that it would create no “undue, adverse impacts” and that it is consistent with LURC’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan.

Burns said the LURC staff dismissed the values of “remoteness and the relative absence of development” cited in the plan and embraced a “human dominated landscape” in the western mountains as a suitable substitute.

She said the deference that the 116-page recommendation displayed toward the developer sets a bad precedent. “The bar it creates is so low that every future project would be able to walk right over it,” she said.

LURC Director Catherine Carroll said the staff recommendation, which she helped write, was reviewed by the Attorney General’s Office and it’s “nonsense” to assert that the proposed rezoning violates the law.

“If this was a potentially illegal decision, I would have known about it and it would not have been released to the commission,” Carroll said.

She said she expects that Wednesday’s meeting will produce a “thumbs up (or) thumbs down” decision on the application, with the votes of four of the seven LURC members needed for approval. The developer and the interveners will be permitted to make brief comments but no new evidence may be introduced.

David Field of the Appalachian Trail Conservancy said he was distressed at the proposed development’s impact on views enjoyed by hikers along the trail.

Unlike radio towers, roads, buildings and ski trails, the wind turbines will introduce motion to the landscape through rapidly moving blades so huge that they can be seen clearly throughout their range of motion, Field said.

He said that if the project is approved, no Maine mountain, other than perhaps Katahdin, Bigelow or Cadillac, would be off-limits to development.

The organizations, which were interveners in last year’s hearings on the Redington project, emphasized that they recognized the need to expand the nation’s sources of renewable energy and support the development of wind power in other protected mountain zones.

The $130 million project, put together by a subsidiary of California-based Edison International and Endless Energy in Yarmouth, is designed to produce enough electricity to supply 40,000 homes while eliminating more than 730,000 pounds of pollution per day from existing power plants.

By Jerry Harkavy, Associated Press Writer

boston.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky