[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bird charity blow to wind farm plan 

The RSPB is objecting to a controversial plan to build the West’s biggest wind farm next to the Bristol Channel, we can reveal.

Experts from the bird charity are unhappy with the proposal for nine 110m (361ft) turbines at West Hinkley, beside Hinkley Point nuclear power station.

They say more work should be done on the wind farm’s possible impact on nearby birds in the Severn estuary, especially shelduck, ringed plover and curlews.

It is thought to be the first time the RSPB has objected to a turbine scheme in the South West, and the charity says it was not a decision taken lightly.

But it felt it was left with no choice after concerns at some of the preparation work carried out by renewable power firm Your Energy, which wants to build the turbines.

The firm’s own survey work assumes that birds within 800m of the turbines will be permanently displaced. They have estimated this would amount to up to three per cent of the estuary’s spring passage ringed plover, 1.4 per cent of shelduck, and 0.6 per cent of curlews.

Richard Archer, RSPB conservation officer for Somerset, said there is not a definite threat to birds, but more survey work is needed.

He said it is also possible the turbines should be relocated further away from the coastline and that they are very reluctant to take this line because they do support renewable energy projects.

Local campaigners from the West Hinkley Action Group, which has consistently opposed the wind farm idea since it was first suggested in 2004, backed the RSPB’s stance. Meanwhile, Your Energy was unaware yesterday that the RSPB had objected to the wind farm until the Western Daily Press telephoned the firm. The company cannot comment until it sees the formal objection.

By Chris Roe


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky