LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Appeal filed "" as expected "" regarding turbines on Beaver Ridge 

FREEDOM (Jan 10): As many as 30 town residents have signed on to an effort to overturn the recent planning board decision to approve a $12 million wind power project on Beaver Ridge, according to one of the opponents.

Steven Bennett, who owns land abutting the site of the proposed project, said a formal appeal of the decision was filed Saturday.

Addison Chase, chairman of the five-member Freedom Board of Appeals, said the board would hold an organizational meeting at 6:30 p.m. Thursday, Jan. 11, in the town office. Among the issues to be discussed are whether to ask the board of selectmen to hire an attorney to advise the appeals board, and when to start hearings on the appeal of the Beaver Ridge decision.

The appeals board meets infrequently in Freedom. “Maybe once a year,” said Chase.

According to Chase, paperwork in his possession lists the appellants as Steve and Judy Bennett, Jason Wade and Erin Bennett-Wade.

In a brief conversation Monday evening, Bennett said 25-30 Freedom residents had agreed to join the appeal.

Bennett objected to newspaper stories that referred to him as a Freedom selectman. “I am taking this action as an abutter and a taxpayer,” he said.

Bennett referred other questions about the matter to Bangor lawyer Edmond Bearor, who is representing the appellants. Bearor was said to be out of town until the end of the week.

A Jan. 4 letter Bearor sent to Chase stated the planning board improperly found, without sufficient evidence in the record, that the project would meet noise, storm water, fire suppression and other standards in the town’s recently enacted Commercial Development Review ordinance.

In addition, wrote Bearor, the planning board “failed to demonstrate sufficient right title and interest in the area between the end of Sibley Road and the development site, and failed to demonstrate that the project would not adversely affect the scenic or natural beauty of the area.”

Based in Belfast, Copy Editor Andy Kekacs can be reached at 207-338-0484 or by e-mail at andyk@villagesoup.com.

waldo.villagesoup.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky