[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

RSPB — more research needed for wind farm  

The big wind farm debate rumbled on this week as the RSPB again signalled its opposition to the nine-turbine plan for West Hinkley.

The society stood against Your Energy’s proposals when they were first submitted in 2004.

Giant turbines, RSPB representatives say, would have a detrimental effect on the birds living around the site.

And Somerset conservation officer Richard Archer said he wasn’t happy with the lengths the wind firm had gone to allay the society’s fears.

He told the Mercury on Monday: “Our position is that we support renewable energy but we have to look at the implications.

“We have supported the Array wind farm on the Thames recently because working with the developers it was put in the right way because it wasn’t going to have an impact on wildlife.

“For Hinkley the developers have done more surveys (since being refused in 2005) but it hasn’t been as complete as it needs to be.”

Mr Archer said the turbines, which would be built adjacent to the nuclear power station, could affect wildlife for up to 800 metres away. He has sent a letter of objection to West Somerset District Council – the authority handling the application.

“The research that has been carried out has suggested that it could have an impact of up to 800 metres, but it’s not specific,” he added.

“Populations of Shellduck in the Seven Estuary could suffer and that is significant for water birds.”

The second application submitted by West Hinkley Windfarm for 9 wind turbines in November is currently at the consultation stage with a decision expected early this year.

By Ben Pike

bridgwatermercury.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter